August 27, 2008

9021-Oh No!

Sometimes my worlds collide and my professional life in advertising/marketing slams violently against my personal life as a dad. And oftentimes when that happens,it’s a recipe for some kind of commentary. The most recent example of this (interestingly enough) comes as a result of the soon-to-be-broadcast, "re-engineered" version of the new 90210.

It goes like this…

Because the CW Network has refused to pre-screen the first episodes of the new program, a parents group (that I will not name, as I don’t want them to receive any additional promotion) is calling on all advertisers to boycott the program. The group is claiming that the program glorifies (I’m paraphrasing here) "everything that’s bad in the world." This group’s claim is that because the network hasn’t agreed to pre-screen the show, it must be filled with teen sex, teen drug use and worst of all – TEENS!

If this group, which has some kind of self-appointed charter to tell parents and advertisers what to do, had chosen to decry the return of Shannon Dougherty to television, I could see its point. But, this group isn’t upset about bad acting, it’s upset about questionable content. This group, however, has decided what’s okay and what’s not – all by itself. Whatever serves its purposes.

I’m so freaking tired of groups like this. Chances are some dude didn’t have a job and made himself the Executive Director of some made-up "organization," whose "charter" is to save the world by not exposing kids to…the world (or at least, the world according to television).

What’s missing here is just this: If a program is controversial or questionable in content for some age groups, I believe it’s up to the parents to "protect" their kids from that content. Moreover, it’s up to the PARENTS to decide what’s questionable and what’s not. I don’t need some self-righteous blowhard telling me what I should or shouldn’t watch.

And, here is where the worlds collide; I certainly don’t want this same blowhard threatening my clients (or others) with economic consequences if they choose to advertise during these shows. If an advertiser chooses to buy time during 90210, it isn’t supporting teen promiscuity (should that actually be a theme) – it’s simply being smart. ("My demographic is here. My customer is here. I’m going to advertise here.")

This is just another example of the world going to he(ck) in a PC basket. Television is a business (just like being a "parents’ organization" is a business). If you don’t like what’s on – don’t watch it. Just stay out of my life and don’t tell me what I should and shouldn’t/can and can’t do.

I loved the first 90210. In fact, I still watch reruns of it from time to time. I’m not going to watch this new one. I know it’s not "for me," but that’s not the reason. I’m not going to watch it because I think it’s going to suck. Plus, the remake of a masterpiece is never as good as the original!

So…dude…keep your (precious) hands off my entertainment.

I didn't say I was

I didn't say I was surprised. Just said it annoyed me.


322 people found this comment helpful
Why are you acting so

Why are you acting so surprised? This is hardly a new thing- I remember as far back to Tipper Gore fighting these types of battles. There's always one group or another complaining, which brings more attention to the show/artist/music which consequently increases the number of viewers thus the advertisers get more play. Everyone is safe because there are limits to what these shows can air in the first place. Everyone wins.


313 people found this comment helpful
Here here! I totally agree.

Here here! I totally agree. I'm not watching it either, partly because of kidTV and XBOX 360, I never get the "good" tv but mainly because I think it's going to suck too. I think their character range is too wide--many differnt races, an adopted kid, a jock, a geek, a bad girl...the list goes on. I guess that mirrors reality, but I just am not digging it. Jeanie Garth as the school counselor? Very cheesy to me! I guess she's going to save the world because "she's been there, done that?" And I'm sure Andrea (don't know her real name) will make a cameo as some fancy editor. I can jut feel it! And I think it's wrong that Tori didn't get the same $$ as the others. Good for her for walking!

I'm not really into the whole boycotting groups or anything like that. I like to make my own decisions on what is acceptable to our family.

And for goodness sakes, please don't let the writers (or any one else) go on strike again--I "NEED" The Office this season!!! And January can't get here soon enough--Big Love! *that Bill Paxton is such a cutie!*


324 people found this comment helpful